Anton van
Leeuwenhoek is often credited as being the inventor of the microscope, but that
is not actually the case. It would also be unfair to remember him for that and
that alone, because his contributions to microbiology were far more extensive
and important.
He was born
on 24th October 1632 in Delft, Holland, and had an adequate,
although by no means advanced, education. He started in business as a linen
draper, and was clearly a success at his trade. He was a contemporary of the
painter Vermeer, and may well have been a friend of his. His interests clearly
extended well beyond the linen trade, because he learned how to grind glass
magnifying lenses, and was exceptionally good at so doing, helped by his acute
eyesight. Many of his lenses were extremely small, and were made from glass
strings that then formed spherical globules as they cooled.
He made more
than 500 simple microscopes in his lifetime, although these used single lenses,
as opposed to the double-lens compound microscopes that were already in use at
the time. However, what distinguished his instruments was the quality of the
lenses, which gave up to 200 times magnification, which was considerably better
than that of the compound microscopes then available. It has also been
suggested that some of his instruments achieved far better magnifications,
possibly as much as 500 times. He also experimented with many different designs
of microscope, although only a handful have survived to the present day.
Leeuwenhoek’s
real contributions to microbiology came not just from his microscopes but, even
more, from the uses to which he put them. He made observations of anything that
took his interest, had drawings made of what he saw, and sent details of his
observations to the Royal Society in London .
His letters, which had to be translated from Dutch into English before the
London scientists could understand them, spanned 50 years, from 1673 until his
death in 1723 at the remarkable age, for his time, of 90.
He had little
understanding of what he was seeing, having had no scientific training, but
that was part of his value to science, because his descriptions were made
entirely free of assumptions. For example, he observed “an unbelievably great
company of living animalcules” in tooth plaque, without appreciating that these
were bacteria. Of course, nobody else knew their significance in causing
disease either, as he was the first person to observe and describe them.
His other
discoveries included algae, blood cells, sperm cells, foraminifera, nematodes
and rotifers. He observed blood flow in capillaries and the pattern of muscle
fibres. Aside from microbiology, he also examined mineral crystals and fossils.
His
discoveries helped to dispel many myths that were then current as explanations
of natural phenomena, such as that grain weevils were spontaneously created,
and that mussels and other shellfish were produced by sand.
Many of his
early discoveries were doubted by the people who read his papers, and a
delegation was sent to Delft
by the Royal Society to see how van Leeuwenhoek was producing all this
material. However, once he was able to demonstrate his methods at first hand,
his subsequent work was eagerly awaited, and he was elected as a Fellow of the
Royal Society in 1680, although he never attended a meeting. His lasting
contribution to microbiology was therefore the conviction that observation,
rather than guesswork and theory, must lie at the heart of science in this
field.
© John
Welford
No comments:
Post a Comment